They gave their lives that others might have freedom
So the important principle he had glimpsed had to wait a century to be rediscovered.
The government has no rights in the matter, but only a delegated authority.But suppose someone with no benevolent motive whatever, simply wanting work google play gavekort gratis done for his own reasons, should hire the needy man for a wage.Are the humanitarians, the third group, to vote themselves control of both the producers and the needy?It may be said, and it may be true, that in both cases the wielders of power are vicious hypocrites; that their conscious objective was evil from the beginning; nonetheless, they could not have come by the power at all except with the consent and.Obviously there is a great deal of pain and distress incidental to existence.Destruction is so easy that even a minority of persistently evil intent could shortly exterminate the unsuspecting majority of well-disposed persons.The philanthropist, the politician, and the pimp are inevitably found vi vinder når vi vågner in alliance because they have the same motives, they seek the same ends, to exist for, through, and by others.As between the private philanthropist and the private capitalist acting as such, take the case of the truly needy man, who is not incapacitated, and suppose that the philanthropist gives him food and clothes and shelter when he has used them up, he is just.Why do kind-hearted persons call in the political power?When he subtracts his own livelihood from such alms, he must take no more than bare subsistence.To say it shall be all three together is no answer; the verdict must swing upon majority or plurality drawn from one or other group.
But that is absurd.That was sensible and true.They localize that right in the government, as if it were self-existent, forgetting the American axiom that government itself is not self-existent, but is instituted by men for limited purposes.It could only be a world filled with breadlines and hospitals, in which nobody retained the natural power of a human being to help himself or to resist having things done to him.He cannot admit either the divine or the natural order, by which men have the power to help themselves.Then they must assume that the producers are not willing to give what is right.When it is said that everyone should live primarily for others, what is the specific course to be pursued?If he wishes to help humanity, the whole of humanity must be in need.But then Owen became inspired with a humanitarian ambition, to do good to everybody.Having gained power, the Communists took from the peasants the land they already owned and exterminated those who resisted.And only what others want him to do?
This is demonstrably true; nor could it occur otherwise.
(The logical procedure, if it is held that any person exists only for the sake of another, was carried out in semibarbarous societies, when the widow or followers of a dead man were buried alive in his grave.).
In proof of his vocation, he must even forego the happiness of family life, if he were to receive the formal religious sanction.
But if taxes are to be imposed for relief, who is the judge of what is possible or beneficial?